Preserve Golf ban titanium          The pioneer organization aimed at preserving the classic game of golf

 

 

 

Gallery Opinions

Read Deane Beman's Letter to USGA about ball distance

Latest Editorial  "Fans don't really care how many yards the ball  goes"

Editorial Opinion  "What if Mr. Thomas is wrong?"

Editorial Opinion  "Titanium should be banned"

Editorial Opinion

"Enough about Butch"

Your Sounding Board

(Click to send comments)

 

Archives

Triplett's triumph (3/1/00)

Norman's quest for Green (4/24/96)

Mental Game Screenplay

Read summary of full screenplay by Preserve founder Mark Grim

Mental Game Golf Fiction

Preview the first 2 chapters

About the Founder

Press Release

It's here... Preserve Golf's Top 5 World Rankings ranks the players most likely to win the next men's major golf championship...

Top 5 World Rankings

 "Check For New Rankings before Each of the Four Major Championships"

About Preserve Golf

"Who we are, why we exist..."

Suggestions

Home Page

Player Opinions

~Watch for exclusive interviews~

Ernie Els: Ban the long putter

Els again: Titanium and new balls have hurt players like Tiger Woods.

Seve's Perspective Larger balls, more doglegs, ban lob wedges, no long putters.

Ben Crenshaw CIO story about technology's impact on the game "Too Much of a Good Thing"

Jack Nicklaus Lengthening Augusta "is absurd"

Tom Watson (tech.) is "making the game too easy to play"

Nick Price "a sweet spot four times the size of a wooden driver"

Craig Stadler  Walrus says advances have "got to stop somewhere"

The King says ball is going too far, clubs too hot.

 

More Views

Eddie Merrins "They might hit it 400 yards in the next 10 years." (Quoted from a Fox News report)

Preserve Golf cited in Superintendent's Divot Mix November 2003

Former USGA Tech. Director admits USGA is letting fear of litigation direct the game of golf

 

ISSUES & RESEARCH

Driving Stats

Driver Size

Big Head=Big Sweet Spot

Excellent  photo evidence showing sweet spot increase from 1998-2003

Ball Flight Distance

Senior Power?

Bifurcation

Separate Equipment

Deaden Balls?

Tradition v. Technology

Golf Ball Debate

USGA Size Limit

 

LINKS OF INTEREST

USGA

PGA of America

Royal & Ancient GC

The Golf Channel

The Masters

GC Architects

Nicklaus.com

BenCrenshaw.com

 

CONTACT US

Phone: 800-777-7794

Fax: 360-671-1646

Email PreserveGolf

 

 

PRESERVE GOLF

PO Box 29076

Bellingham, WA 98228

"For those who love the game."

Enough about Butch

Why are so many people making such a big deal about the relationship between Tiger Woods and Butch Harmon? It's getting tiring. 

Although I may not have been very old during some of Jack Nicklaus' early droughts without winning a major, I can't remember everyone morbidly focusing on it like they are with Woods. I am almost positive that no one made this big of a deal about who Nicklaus' teacher was or his so-called slump. The great play of those who won majors instead of Nicklaus, like Johnny Miller, or Lee Trevino seemed to get more of the attention back then (I guess they didn't have The Golf Channel back then, though, either).

Why do people like Miller (and others) feel the need to tell Woods who his teacher should be? Does it meet some kind of an emotional need in them?
Maybe they are saying to themselves:

"Tiger is not playing as well as I know he can. I will tell him (and the golf world) what he needs to do. Then, when he wins again, I can prove to everyone that I'm the one who really knew how to help him. If he listens to Butch and I, he will be just fine."

Both Harmon and Miller, have recently pointed out alleged flaws in Woods' swing. 
For example, Harmon's apparently unsolicited analysis in the March Golf Digest was that Woods' right arm was more underneath his left near impact than Adam Scott's, who Harmon claimed was in a better position. Miller has made similar critiques on NBC golf telecasts. 

Woods has indicated that the advice has come his way even though he hasn't made it known what he was working on or what type of shot he was trying to hit at the time of the recording/photos in question. 

Even halfway decent amateurs know that when you are working on a fade or punch, your alignment is usually different, the timing of your hands squaring the club may be different because you are holding on or your wrist may be bowed, etc., etc. Miller and Harmon have both probably pointed out things in this fashion when they should have known better. 

Both men appeared to be trying to force Woods to humble himself by making him jealous or something, by saying that Adam Scott was swinging better than he was.

You could say that all this commotion about the terminated relationship with Harmon is a backhanded compliment to Woods. That attention is fine, to a degree. But enough is enough. 

Some seem to be saying, "See everyone, Tiger is not as good as you all think he is on his own. The only reason he was such a great player was because of Butch Harmon's tweaking and pulling the strings. Now he just needs to check his ego and give Butch a call."

What people like Johnny Miller need to ask themselves is, if this was not Tiger Woods, but another player in the exact same situation, would I be saying the same things? Why am I trying to embarrass him like this? 

We feel compelled to make a suggestion to Miller et al. Let the player pick his own teacher--or not pick his own teacher, for that matter. That is how the golf world has always treated professional golfers. 

As a matter of fact, the room that the game leaves open to individualistic approaches is one of the most attractive features of the game. There have been many, many great self-taught players who rarely, if ever, used a teacher. Others use them sparingly, and still others depend on them extensively. Woods surely knows--better than most--the value of good teaching and how to apply it. There is no way he could have compiled the phenomenal record he has without knowing this. 

Harmon is undoubtedly a great teacher. However, any credit the teacher gets should be doled out by the player and the player alone. Isn't that, after all, why the teacher gets paid? 

When Woods was at his peak winning majors and many other tournaments, Harmon started showing up to congratulate him after the victory in front of the TV cameras. Isn't it common sense that a teacher shouldn't be anywhere near his student in such a situation, unless of course, the player insists? If any kudos are in order, leave it up to the player to decide. If the player doesn't say anything, it doesn't matter anyway. You got paid, right? 

--Mark Grim 

June 24, 2004

 

email comments to:

preservegolf@panhandlepremium.com

© 2004. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission of Preserve Golf.

For the full opinion of PreserveGolf.com, please click here.

  © 2003-2007 Preserve Golf. Founded November 10, 2003. All Rights Reserved.